top of page

Case Studies

IT Governance Transformation Across Multiple Countries

A multinational energy company with operations across Europe, Central Asia, and Africa faced increasing pressures to unify IT governance and improve accountability. Each subsidiary operated with its own structure, tools, and reporting cycles.

Challenge

The client struggled with:

  • inconsistent IT processes across regions

  • unclear ownership and overlapping responsibilities

  • slow decision-making and poor visibility of project status

  • recurring audit findings related to governance and documentation

Leadership needed a unified governance model that could work across different cultures and regulatory environments.

Analysis & Approach

Conducted a structured discovery phase:

  • interviewed business and technology leaders across 9 countries

  • mapped existing processes and decision flows

  • evaluated governance maturity using COBIT and NIST-aligned criteria

  • defined accountability gaps using a full RACI analysis

  • identified inconsistencies in project execution and reporting

Solution Delivered

Implemented a fully integrated governance framework:

  • new regional operating model

  • standardized reporting and performance KPIs

  • unified project lifecycle and approval checkpoints

  • clear role definitions and communication flows

  • cross-country alignment workshops and leadership coaching

Results

  • 30% faster regional reporting cycle

  • audit deviations reduced after the first quarter

  • improved collaboration between business, IT, and vendors

  • significantly increased leadership confidence in IT delivery

  • predictable execution of key technology and digital initiatives

Key Takeaways

  • Governance became measurable and consistent

  • Processes were simplified and adopted across all regions

  • Leadership gained transparency and actionable insights

A critical infrastructure operator faced increasing regulatory pressure to demonstrate cybersecurity maturity across IT and OT environments.

Challenge

The organization lacked:

  • clear risk-based prioritization

  • integration between IT and OT security teams

  • readiness for regulatory audits

  • documented controls aligned with NIST, ISO, or national cybersecurity requirements

Analysis & Approach

COMRAD Consulting performed a comprehensive evaluation:

  • NIST CSF–based maturity scoring

  • assessment of access control, network segmentation, asset inventory, and incident response

  • review of vendor security practices

  • interviews with IT, OT, and engineering teams

  • documentation and gap mapping

Solution Delivered

We developed a structured improvement roadmap:

  • prioritized actions based on risk appetite and budget

  • corrective plans for high-risk findings

  • alignment with regulatory expectations

  • quick wins for immediate risk reduction

  • long-term strategy for maturity progression

Results

  • improved cybersecurity maturity by an entire level within 6 months

  • cleared the regulatory pre-audit without non-conformities

  • reduced dependency on external vendors

  • strengthened cooperation between IT and OT teams

Key Takeaways

  • Clients received clarity on risks and priorities

  • Compliance became easier and predictable

  • Cybersecurity investment became measurable and justified

Cybersecurity Readiness Assessment (Energy Sector)

Physical Security Integration & Response Optimization

A large industrial site required modernization of its physical security, which included outdated procedures, fragmented incident response, and mismatched technologies.

Challenge

The client experienced:

  • slow incident response

  • manual and inconsistent reporting

  • lack of integration between CCTV, access control, and guard procedures

  • no unified crisis response standard

Analysis & Approach

Conducted a full evaluation:

  • ISO 22320–aligned operational readiness check

  • review of physical infrastructure (CCTV, access control, patrol routes)

  • audit of security documentation and escalation processes

  • interviews with guards, supervisors, and facility leadership

  • incident simulation exercises

Solution Delivered

It was introduced:

  • integrated command-and-control workflow

  • modernized surveillance and automated alerts

  • standard operating procedures for security personnel

  • escalation hierarchy and crisis management playbooks

  • training program for guards and supervisors

Results

  • incident response time reduced by 50%

  • fewer false alarms and unnecessary escalations

  • higher discipline and consistency in patrols and reporting

  • significantly improved cooperation with external emergency services

Key Takeaways

  • Physical security became structured and predictable

  • Technology and processes finally worked together

  • Management gained confidence in site protection

bottom of page